Case study: Reducing shellside maldistribution
in a condenser

Summary

An engineering, procurement, and construction company asked HTRI to investigate methods—constrained by permissible pressure drop—to mitigate shellside flow maldistribution for an X-shell condenser, using cold seawater on the tube side to condense an off-gas on the shell side.

Challenge

  • Determine optimal geometric design modifications that minimize maldistribution and potential structural damage
  • Assess the potential maldistribution in a modified X-shell condenser

Implementation

Baseline geometry and conditions for X-shell condenser
Length 9.1 m
Diameter 2.4 m
Crosspasses 12
Support plates 11
Tubeside fluid Cold seawater
Shellside fluid Off-gas
Total shellside inlet mass flow rate 12.6 kg/s
Inlet temperature 61.7 °C
Inlet nozzle One 1.5-m diameter
Distributor plate None

To determine the optimal geometric design modifications, HTRI used ANSYS FLUENT® to develop CFD simulations to

  • determine the vapor flow distribution above the bundle of the X shell prior to condensation
  • quantify the uniformity of flow through the 12 crosspasses of the client’s exchanger
  • evaluate the effect of adding different numbers and sizes of nozzles, as well as a distributor plate

The client supplied Xist® ratings that were used to calibrate the CFD pressure drop model. The Xist calculations of pressure drop across the tube bundle enabled the substitution of porous media in the simulations. CFD models developed from the Xist analysis provided reliable prediction of other flow conditions.

HTRI modeled a symmetric half of the exchanger along a longitudinal, diametrical-cut plane through the X-shell cross-section. This approach reduced the computational effort through the exchanger model domain while maintaining good solution accuracy. A Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solver was applied, which employed a k-omega Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model. Second-order accurate discretization schemes were used for momentum and mass continuity equations.

This setup provided pressure and flow distribution data throughout the domain. The information was used to modify the mechanical design of the nozzles and distributor plate, as well as to predict the erosion and vibration potential of the first row of tubes.

Uneven velocity distribution in the original X-shell condenser as the flow passes through the baffles across the exchanger.
Flow enters from a single nozzle at the top and exits at the bottom. The central crosspasses have more than twice as much flow as others.

Results

From the CFD simulation of the baseline geometry and conditions, HTRI determined that the central crosspasses of the X shell had more than twice as much flow as others. Additional simulations were run using

  • a single nozzle with an added distributor plate of various lengths, as well as different pressure loss coefficients
  • two inlet nozzles (fed from a distribution manifold with a distributor plate)

Centering a 3.0-m long distributor plate with discretely variable porosity beneath the inlet nozzle improved the distribution so that the flow rates between the crosspasses differed by only 16%. Adding a distributor plate along the entire length of the bundle provided essentially uniform flow to the entire bundle.

Placing two 1.1-m diameter inlet nozzles, with inflow from a 1.6-m diameter distribution manifold, indicated a level of maldistribution only slightly better than the baseline case with a single inlet nozzle. Again, adding a distributor plate with discretely variable porosity along the entire length of the bundle provided essentially uniform flow to the bundle.

The same X-shell condenser with two inlet nozzles. As shown, the flow distribution improved due to an additional distribution plate along the entire bundle length.

Contact us for more information at contracts@htri.net.

Shellside Maldistribution Case Study
Download case study